Who was the presiding judge at Clavicular’s Florida alligator shooting hearing? Internet trends with the ‘Looksmaxxing’ streamer being ‘mogged’

Judge Marcus Bach-Armas from Florida’s Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court took the internet by the storm when he “mogged” looksmaxxer influencer, Clavicular. Influencer and creator Clav or Brandon Eric Peter is best known for popularizing the “looksmaxxing” movement. Looksmaxxing is an Internet slang term that refers to the practice of maximizing one’s natural features to look attaractive.

However, internet is set ablaze with users claiming that Florida’s Judge Marcus outshone Peter in the court and that he looks far more attaractive than the creator. Users also highlighted the irony of the court specifcally picking Judge Marcus to preside over Peter’s case. A user (@DrewPavlou) called Judge Marcus “chad”,

“It’s so funny that Miami-Dade Circuit Court found the most chad Judge in history to sentence Clavicular”

Another user (@gigachad) called the judge “The chad justicemaxxer”,

“Clavicular BRUTALLY JUSTICEMOGGED by Gigachad Judge.”

Another user (@kirawontmiss) insinuated that the court assigned Judge Marcus “on purpose”,

“you can’t convince me they didn’t assign him this judge on purpose😭😭”

Some fans (@FearedBuck) compared Judge Marcus’ features with Clav claiming that the latter is more attaractive,

“Clavicular fans show why the “chad” judge did not mog Clavicular”

Another user (@adventurehimbo) joked that the creator must be “leaking cortisol” for being mogged by someone who has a “real job”,

“Getting mogged that hard by someone with a real job must have had him LEAKING cortisol”


More about Clavicular’s allegator shooting incident

In a March 26 livestream, the “looksmaxxer” creator, and his buddy Andrew Morales appeared to fire multiple gunshots into swamp water from an airboat in the Everglades Wildlife Management Area, West of Miami. As per reports, the duo shot at a dead alligator more than two-dozen times.

Hours after the incident, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission claimed that they have launched a probe into the incident. The commission claimed that shooting without authorization from the commission with an attempt to kill is illegal.

The creator’s attorney had previously claimed that Clav was “following the instructions of a licensed airboat guide” and that “no animals of people were harmed” during the incident.

As per a report by NBC6, the duo in court on May 15 pleaded no-contest to charges of unlawfully discharging a firearm in public. Under the deal, the duo has to complete firearms and wildlife safety courses and 20 hours of community service that “cannot be streamed or monetised.” As per Peters’ lawyers, the creator has “accepted responsibility for his conduct.”