The actress defended the controversial former governor despite his resignation amid harassment allegations
La La Anthony stepped into turbulent political waters on November 4, 2025, when she publicly endorsed Andrew Cuomo for New York City mayor. The actress and television personality’s decision to back the former governor raised eyebrows across social media, particularly given his resignation from office in August 2021 following multiple sexual harassment allegations that cast a shadow over his political career.
Anthony took to social media to share her support, posting a photograph of herself alongside Cuomo and explaining her reasoning for backing his mayoral campaign. She emphasized their longtime acquaintance and praised his dedication to criminal justice reform, noting that she had witnessed his leadership capabilities firsthand. The post concluded with an encouragement for her followers to participate in the democratic process by casting their votes.
Social media erupts with criticism
The response from online users came swiftly and forcefully. Many questioned Anthony’s judgment in aligning herself with a political figure whose tenure as governor ended under controversial circumstances. Critics pointed out that supporting someone with such a fraught history sent a problematic message, particularly in an era where accountability for workplace misconduct has become a central cultural conversation.
One particularly harsh response on X suggested that Anthony had made a miscalculation on multiple fronts, noting that she had aligned herself with a candidate who carried significant baggage and ultimately failed to win the election. The comment reflected a broader sentiment among those who felt the endorsement was tone-deaf to the serious nature of the allegations that led to Cuomo’s resignation.
The backlash highlighted how celebrity political endorsements can backfire when the chosen candidate has a complicated past. Many social media users expressed disappointment that Anthony would use her platform to support someone they viewed as having betrayed public trust during his time in office.
Defenders speak up for the actress
Not everyone condemned Anthony’s political stance. Several supporters came to her defense, arguing that she had every right to express her political preferences without facing personal attacks. These defenders emphasized that disagreeing with someone’s political choices should not result in vitriol or attempts to silence their voice in the public square.
The defense of Anthony sparked its own debate about whether celebrities should face different standards when voicing political opinions compared to private citizens. Some argued that having a public platform comes with added responsibility, while others maintained that fame should not strip anyone of their fundamental right to participate in political discourse.
Cuomo loses his comeback bid
When election results came in, Andrew Cuomo‘s attempt at a political comeback fell short. Zohran Mamdani claimed victory, making history as New York City’s first millennial mayor and the first Muslim to hold the position. The outcome represented a significant generational and cultural shift in the city’s political landscape.
Mamdani’s victory raised questions about whether celebrity endorsements carry the weight they once did, especially when the candidate in question brings substantial controversy to the race. The loss suggested that voters were ready to move beyond the old guard and embrace new leadership unburdened by past scandals.
The ongoing celebrity politics conversation
Anthony’s endorsement of Cuomo reignited a familiar debate about the role public figures should play in political campaigns. Advocates for celebrity involvement argue that famous individuals have platforms that can draw attention to important issues and candidates, potentially increasing voter engagement and participation. Their visibility can shine a light on races that might otherwise receive less media coverage.
Critics counter that celebrity endorsements can be superficial and may not reflect a deep understanding of policy positions or governance issues. They argue that famous people sometimes support candidates based on personal relationships rather than careful evaluation of their records and platforms. When celebrities back controversial figures, the criticism intensifies.
The intersection of entertainment and politics continues to evolve, with social media amplifying both the reach and the potential consequences of celebrity political statements. What might have once been a simple endorsement now becomes a lightning rod for broader cultural conversations about accountability, judgment and the proper use of influence.
Anthony’s experience serves as a reminder that public figures must carefully consider not just which candidates they support, but how their endorsements will be received by diverse audiences with varying perspectives on political history and accountability.